There’s no such thing
as bad publicity. Do you think that’s true? I tend to disagree with the
philosophy, but in this verse it seems Paul might go along with it. Word has
come to him that there are people who are preaching the gospel with less than
honorable motives – envy, ambition, and a desire to stir up trouble for Paul –
but Paul is just happy that the word is getting out.
I find Paul’s outlook a little surprising because I thought
that doing the right thing for the wrong reason was a bad thing. But here is
Paul, contradicting my long-held belief. Paul doesn’t care about motives – he
cares about truth. Motives take second place to preaching the true gospel.
But what about the lifestyle of the preacher? What if he is
well-known for his dishonesty, or he is openly gay? He beats his wife and
gambles away his paycheck? Shouldn’t the messenger match the message?
If a man rescues your child from a burning building just to
get a reward, should we object to his not having the right motives? What if that
child needed medical attention but the rescuer was not an EMT? Should he have
left your child in the fire? This hero is not a trained professional, his
motives are not pure, and his rescue is incomplete because he doesn’t know CPR.
Your child’s life may still be at risk but at least he is safe from the fire.
Should we not rejoice?
Can we
better understand Paul’s attitude now? I think he would say that
desperate times call for emergency procedures. He was in prison and so his freedom to preach was limited.
But jail and wrong motives will not hinder the gospel. “God’s work was still
getting done, and that was cause for rejoicing.”*
|
No comments:
Post a Comment